
So you've no doubt seen this story or one like it explaining that Universal Music Group won't renew its iTunes deal. And you've seen people saying that the majors are trying to "recalibrate" their relationships with us. Actually what's happening is they're crapping in their pants. They woke up one day and realized that we've got 80% share of digital downloads. Suddenly all the power in the value chain resides in one player. Oops.
Here's the thing. These guys could have done what we did. In the early days of the Internet, everyone figured the majors would build digital distribution arms. But they didn't do it, because they didn't understand technology, and they didn't want to invest in building this expertise, and they were freaked out about piracy and paralyzed with fear. So we stepped in. We made the big investment. We hired programmers. We developed software that's easy to use and works flawlessly. (If you think that's trivial, think again. It's huge.) We ran the system. We promoted it, we marketed it, we haggled with all the majors and struck deals. We took all the risk, which was considerable. Now we're reaping the reward. And the majors want a bigger slice. Um, for what? We did all the work. Ain't gonna happen, slick.
Here's the back story. The music companies are in a dying business, and they know it. Sure, they act all cool because they hang around with rock stars. But beneath all the glamour these guys are actually operating two very low-tech businesses. One is a form of loan-sharking: they put up money to make records, then force recording artists to pay the money back with exorbitant interest. The other business is distribution. They’ve got big warehouses and they control the shipment of little plastic boxes that happen to have music in them.
The guys running the labels are pretty stupid -- most are just dirtbags who started out as band managers or promoters -- but now at long last they are kinda sorta finally vaguely getting clued in to the fact that both parts of their business model are fucked. Their loan-sharking business is being eliminated by low-cost digital recording technology that lets people make an album for very little money. And by letting us build the online music store they've taken themselves out of the distribution business. In the days of vinyl and then CDs, the labels managed to control the value chain by having loads of retailers in a highly fragmented market, and playing them off each other. In the digital world they've got us. And that's it.
Ironically the mistake the major labels made was the same one that IBM made when it gave the DOS franchise to Microsoft nearly 30 years ago. They were faced with a new market that they didn't understand. They had a piece of work that they couldn't do on their own or didn't want to do on their own and they didn't view it as critical or important, so they outsourced it to a partner. The partner turned that seemingly unimportant work into a way to accrue power and create a monopoly and control the industry. Today in the music business we're about where IBM and Microsoft were in 1989, when IBM finally got hit with the clue stick and realized what Microsoft was doing.
How will it play out this time? I don't know, honestly. But I like our chances.
Wednesday, July 04, 2007
The music industry nobs have finally figured out what we're doing
Posted by
Steve
at
3:48 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

78 comments:
I'm now convinced: Fake Steve Jobs = Real Steve Jobs.
How's it feel to finally reveal the endgame, SJ?
Rock on :)
As usual, all of the concepts are laid out for us like a mother lays out a schoolchild's clothes on their bed in the morning. All we have to do is put them on. Brilliant.
(sent from my iPhone by the way - the keyboard rocks once you give in to 'the force' )
I miss vinyl.
if Universal goes away, they will try to sell online by themselves and realise their market share won't go up. People will simply stick to their ipod/itunes because it's easy, integrated and they will forget Universal. So Universal would eventually come back to iTunes because there's no other widely used distribution->music player integration standard.
I'm a sound engineer and even from the inside it seems the majors still haven't got a clue. Their production business is also going away as most of the expensive studio work , although not 100% of it, can be replaced by a budget computer nowadays. Many artists self-produce their CD.
cornered rats...
Get Cool: Cupertino Edition
Dudes....
So Apple should start a "record company" like Apple Records and sign up artists. Then distribute directly on iTunes. Bono will be in it and the trickle will turn into a flood.
All that is needed is an easy way for artists to create and upload music to iTunes.
Wait... What would it take to integrate GarageBand to iTunes? Gee! Since they are both Apple products it shouldn't take much. Especially since it is currently being worked on.
Right FSJ?
Big record companies are soooooo yesterday.
FSJ,
This is pure gold. Is there anything you can't do?
Also, re:vinyl
Q: Have you heard the one about the lo-fi indie musician?
A: I have that joke at home on vinyl.
Seems like the labels finally have some real competition. Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of people . . .
Steve: when they come crawling back, give 'em a penny less per song than they were getting before, just as a lesson!
Apple is one step closer to world domination... iWorld domimation. Muhahahahaha!!!!
After looking at the first comment, I don't know what to put down any more.
Fake Steve Jobs, whether he's the Real Steve Jobs, totally rocks!
LOL
Emad =P
My favorite artist is on a label but will sell you CD's of his directly for a great price. You send him an email, he sends the CD's, you send a check. Works great. He gets paid, you get music and a little interaction with the artist.
What are record labels for again?
•Anonymous fomer Kazaa-junky
I too am not convinced that FSJ = RSJ
hmmm RSJ is also the acronym for
Rigid Steel Joist?!?
Shit, freudian tpying, meant to say...
I too am 'now' convinced...
Preach On FSJ!
You have nailed the industry in a few short paragraphs.
I still hope FSJ is not the real Steve, because I am a share holder and I want FSJ to run Apple when the real Steve retires.
--mbj
Spot. Fucking. On.
Well lets see what happens when the CEO of Universal ( Doug Morris ) gets a call from Bono or Eminem or Timberland etc. along the lines of . . .
B: Hello C++++
DM: Hi Bono, Great to hear from you too.
B: Listen C+++ what's all this about us not being on iTunes,
DM: Well you know I just thought we could screw some more money out of Apple
B: Your getting most of the money as it is C+++, so how are we going to benefit ?
DM: Well we'll figure something out, right friend . . .
B: Listen, if we're not on iTunes we're not on Universal, right C+++, we'll deal with Apple direct and make what you are taking from us now, Oh Yes . . .
DM:But Bono . . .
It will happen with some artists sooner or later, but Apple has to start dealing with more indie/unsigned bands in the future on the assumption that the Apple Corps thing is now done and dusted.
As Justin Timberlake once said "What Goes Around...Comes Around"
RSJ: "My offer is this: nothing. Not even the $20,000 for the gaming license, which I would appreciate if you would put up personally."
RSJ does not = FSJ because RSJ would not insult someone by using the term 'knob,' seeing that RSJ not British.
either way, great piece.
Yeah, yeah...enjoy and all that. But remember, a world with less competition is a poorer world.
Apple Board Member: "But why would they sell us their entire music catalog?"
RSJ: "I'll make them an offer they can't refuse."
Just because reading this page I will buy something from itunes plus to support the right way.
I'm astonished that you just said that Apple is like Microsoft.
Hey Steve,
See my comments about this in your more recent, follow-up blog post.
Putting My Thoughts Where They're Most Easily Found in Caledonia,
->AMD FanBoi
I don't remember the last time I bought a CD. I don't even know what record labels do anymore (other than fund shows like American Idol).
Here's the real point: Record Labels provide NO value - people know it, musicians no it. To kill them off quicker - just offer a way that musicans can upload their music - promote it - and make some money off it and in 3-5 years - no more record labels.
Another point: Labels will start consolidating (like radio stations) just so they have strength in numbers and volume - but their power will have been life tapped like a toon in World of Warcraft.
>>>RSJ does not = FSJ because RSJ would not insult someone by using the term 'knob,' seeing that RSJ not British.
I've seen this comment before about FSJ being British because he throws some English slang around. Maybe FSJ uses slang because RSJ does it too.
Maybe it's some sort of affectation RSJ picked up from hanging around Jon Ive - like how Madonna picked up a British accent from getting the hot beef injection from Guy Ritchie.
Whatever.
Apple has done a great thing by making the record companies useless. It will put more power back in the hands of the artists and put the money there too. Just sign up Trent Reznor once his Interscope deal is over. He plainly hates the whole situation and would relish a way out.
Steve-o, could yer just hold back a feckin' second there, me ol' flip-flop? Me an The Edge and the other fella whose name I can't remember but he plays the drums, we're on the Universal team, right? So, don't go rockin' the feckin' boat. The last thing I need right now while I'm up to me arse with G8's an all that is to have someone step on me cashflow hose. I'm the one trying like feck to save the world round here, not you. You're a great fella and you know I think the world of you, but sometimes you're a feckin' eejit.
One of your best. You never cease to amazing me when it comes to your insights when it comes to getting to the heart of things. This is one of the best on this site has put out. Period.
I would hope that it come out on Apple's side, but this is one of those messy crossroads. But it is my hope Apple would take the place of the records companies (at least with SJ at the reigns). The record companies as being the Gatekeepers of the information have grown just plain Greedy (or in your opinion have always been that, I really don't know), but that does no good for the artist and the consumer. As much as RSJ may hate this (due to the Beatles) I would like to hear this about this record industry:
Apple is dead. Long live Apple.
This is one of the best blogpostings I've ever read.
BTW, RSJ knows where Lisbon is. FSJ didn't.
Bravo!
Wow this should be required reading for everyone in the music industry, and everyone thinking about entering the music industry. Loan sharking for records (and videos) plus distribution, and both can be done for cheap now because its all digital. Yeah when you boil it down to the core then that's the music business. Who needs major music labels anymore, they dug their own graves! All artists just starting out should rent a recording studio with freelance engineers and producers for a while (there are lots available) and then do the work to create and promote their recordings via online distribution, because that's what they need to do anyway now. Maybe hire some own PR folks once you make it to get you on radio, festivals and MTV, but that's basically it. And all major artists could directly sign deals with Apple, Amazon et. al. ;-)
FSJ = Jon Ive of course... this way he also gets a piece of attention for running the firm... :)
"Knob" is British slang for pecker, but FSJ used the term "nob", which is short for nabob. Nob Hill in SF is named after the the 4 nabobs who lived there - Mark Hopkins, Leland Stanford, Charles Crocker and Collis P. Huntington - The Big Four.
Wow, some people really need to get a life.
Consider all the vitriol around here, you'd think we were talking about arms companies not record companies, but then I suppose the bomb makers are only killing foreigners, whilst record companies expect us to pay for something we have come to expect for free, imagine that.
You know music isn't free, because their aren't enough good musicians out there. The record companies do actually nurture new talent (look recording studios and money do cost money - yes I know you could do it all at home with GarageBand - pity it sounds like shit then).
Less money gets spent now on music then it does on video games, and it is only going to get worse as people find other ways to pass their meaningless dreary living hours.
Ok UMG might be at the dinosaur end of the business, but honestly without the hype and the exposure that the record companies generate, music is basically going to turn into open mike nights at your local bar, and not much more. So all the musicians out their who dream of being the next Bowie - how happy are you that only 50 people will hear your greatest performance?
Just to play devil's advocate here, labels do actually do other things besides recording and distribution. Like promotion and tour support for example. If the major record labels were to close up shop tomorrow, smaller indie artists and such would continue to build a following on word of mouth, but most of the larger acts are built entirely on being pushed through MTV, radio and other advertising. Most of the music being bought through iTunes is music people see on MTV and hear on the radio. And while you may have quality judgments on that music, the fact remains that most people aren't interested in hunting down new exciting artists. In fact, they actually kind of like having it spoon-fed to them. And that's a hole that iTunes doesn't yet fill.
screw itunes... the DRM killed it for me. Check out Boomkat.com
Record companies do fund marketing and promotion. But the nature of the business demands that they get the biggest bang for their buck, so the bands that get any meaningful support are the ones with broadest appeal. It's not that they're all terrible and that there's no chance something great will come through, it's just less likely.
And those most-promoted artists make incredible amounts of money. Then, people spend less on smaller, more niched artists.
The world without five big record labels is one in which the money the public spends on music will be spread among more artists, *encouraging* creativity. If there's no pressure for a group to make a big splash, they can be more true to the artistry.
Maybe the bulk of well-known artists will push at the six-figure annual income. Maybe some folks will manage to be middle class. Maybe others will be able to engage it as a side job or a hobby that earns them a few extra bucks. Not to begrudge anyone making money, but that seems like a reasonable deal that would allow more people to be somehow compensated for making music.
George Smiley's comment is the best.
Nice theory, but completely wrong. Record companies own the music, the IP, and those back catalogs are piles of infinite money (unless infinite copyright goes away). What's happening is distribution is becoming a commodity, so iTunes is going to fade away eventually, too. Apple is a middleman and the Internet eliminates the need for middlemen. Arbitrage like this works for a while, but at the end of the day the record companies are going to get bought out by other media-owning companies like Disney. New music is harder and harder to make money from for the music companies, so they'll focus their efforts on maximizing revenue from their catalog.
Here's a though Apple's itunes used to be a monopoly a while back but as new sites pop up that offer better payment plans and more adaptive pricing policy. Plus Ipod sales hit rock bottom before the iPhone launch and we're talking about 10-15 million per quarter that are now gone. The ipod world market share has hit an all time low and I guess the guys at Universal started doing some calculations. Ipod and itunes are an enclosed system for the most part which worked a few years back. But here's the catch the competitors are going massively into download on the go while itunes is holding on to it's old system in desperation for a bigger software share. And here comes the deal breaker iphone the successor of the ipod and the hail merry play for the folks at the fruit store. Only problem is that universal sat down had the manpower dedicated to selling the device calculated, then it matched up that with the life expectancy of the ipods in circulation compared to that of the global market of mp3 phones and players and reached a stunning conclusion. If this is the future of the ipod we're screwed because the folks at apple can't physically sell it fast enough to gain even a fraction of the market share the ipod had accumulated. Face it the iphone doomed the ipod in a way. If you're looking for cheap you go to the other firms if you're looking for an ipod why settle with just a player chen you can have it all. But the problem is that the 2000 stores that sell it can sell it at a rate of 50 k per day tops, forget the overestimates at the news sites and do some digging into just how much time it takes to sell one and just how many points of sale are dedicated to it. It gets creepy. So here's how it goes 50 k per day times 30 days(we're not counting holidays and we're deffinatly not counting low spending periods) per month 1,5 million makes it 4,5 per quarter or 3 times less than what the ipod was bringing in. Given that a part of the market for ipods stays (hardly due to the overpricing and slow responce to drops in the prices of competitors) they are still 5-6 milion short of the quota. And we're talking a growing market not something that's standing still. Thing is universal figures that it's losing customers who are leaving the ipod because there is a limited supply and moving to alternatives that are not tied with itunes. So it's doing the logical thing and is bailing on the entire iSale. If you don't belive that the amount of stores that offer your product counts think again, when the ipod started selling at walmart they had a 2 milion sales boost for that quarter.
So how long until iTunes starts signing acts to distribution deals? Imagine if Coldplay or Beyonce signed with iTunes directly and skipped having a record contract with a major label? It could happen, and it should happen. Hopefully it does. That's when the revolution in the music industry really begins.
I just hope you don't turn out to be an enormous greedy anal-opening as Microsoft have. But you're on the right track - I'm convinced you've developed technology that's five or more years ahead of it's time, but you don't have the guts to put it in the open right away - you'd rather make money on each of the five stages of development you label as final products and sell one after the other before the actual thing comes out. By that time, you'd have thought up something else. And that's not visionary. That's just low.
As usual, nicely done fake steve jobs, but you forgot one important market function of the record companies: marketing. They have tremendously deep and long-standing relationships with the various pieces of the music market that make hits. They knpw how to get radio play, they know how to get their people in Us magazine, they can get some washed-up artist to be the celebrity "coach" on American idol, etc. Not that the record companies' roles aren't severely diminished in the digital age, they are. And these functions that I mention can be taken over by other entities. But the record companies aren't quite dead yet.
I challenge you, fake Steve: Can you put THIS into your iphone?
http://songspotting.blogspot.com/
why would someone create a blog pretending to be someone that they aren't? i am so confused...
A great mind is behind this article.
You missed one other nail in the coffin of the music industry. They've run out of new ideas. So much of the music of the last 50 years came from the huge advances of music technology and society, which has now leveled off. Its getting very hard to sell the same thing over and over
if they gave out a pulitzer for tech blogging, you'd win it.
this is brilliant!
Up to a point. Music is a marketing business. They find a band and then spend an enormous amount of money making us think they are cool.
Then as you say, they claw the money back from the artists from the sales.
The bands are still using the same three chords and wearing the same tight trousers.
iTunes isn't that great. Music should have done a deal with napster before online *really* took off.
PS only about 10-15per cent of sales are digital.
ummmm can you all not see that apple is being just as greedy as Universal?
Yes labels make a lot of money, but who is going to market and promote the artists if the label is gone? Honestly, think about it. Who is going to do it? Everyone seems to forget that music is marketing. Sure, you could have the best damn song ever written, but without the backend support, who is going to hear about it? Where you going to read about it? And is iTunes going to release every fucking track from every artist that thinks they have the greatest song ever written. I think not. The labels need iTunes, and iTunes needs the labels. Remember, it is all about the marketing. Sure, the artist could market themselves, but as a radio station, or magazine, or newspaper, or iTunes, are you going to take every call from every artist who is claiming the same thing? No chance. Yes, the current label model is broken, but doing away with the labels is going to do nothing to help the industy. And besides, the last I checked, digital is only 12% of the business.
The record companies also do marketing, yes (for whose money?) but there are artists that do that work themselves, and are better off for it.
If they're not signed up with one of those companies, but keep all the rights themselves and thus get a bigger cut from the profits, they don't need to sell as much either to earn the same.
Err, marketing in trad media matters about as much as the record companies. The power is with the people now. The media is dead, long live the media.
The very best analysis I’ve read.
So Apple is behaving like Microsoft now, and this is somehow a good thing?
Fake Steve is probably too young to remember the transition from vinyl to 8 track and cassette tapes. Not wanting to make the investment in infrastructure to manufacture tapes, the labels licensed their rights to third parties - primarily GRT - to manufacture and distribute their product under the label's logos. Once GRT showed the labels how it was done, and it was clear that tapes would be profitable, the labels stopped licensing GRT, took the manufacturing and distribution in house and GRT went out of business. The scenario will not be the same here, however, letting the RSJ put up all the money for the R&D of what is clearly a transitional technology (between CDs and mobile streaming) may not be such a bad strategy on the part of the labels. In the mean time, trying to cut better deals with the RSJ is just good business. I'm sure the labels can't wait for the day they can hand the RSJ his head.
The article is a masterpiece, but some of the comments are hilarious, especially the ones trying to point out how valuable the labels are due to their marketing ability.
McCartney sold twice as many CDs through Starbucks than his last EMI release.
Prince just sold 3 million CDs and 300,000 concert tickets in the UK, where Sony refused to distribute.
Radio? When's the last time you heard a "new, exciting artist" on the radio?
You know who really misses vinyl? The labels. Musicians couldn't make vinyl records in their living room.
I think you are leaving out the marketing arm of the music industry. They tell people what to listen to and then people listen to it. I understand that the internet provides people a way to find music that is not marketed by the major labels, but untill there is something as effective as the major labels marketing I think they will still be able to hold on.
The problem with the big music companies going their own way is that the people who have market share beside Apple are offering cheaper music than what the record companies want to sell at. Also, the competition from free downloading sites is still very real to them. Trying to carve out a piece of the market where your options are free or Apple isn't going to happen. When the music companies try to copy Apple's website, besides getting sued for patent infringement, will take the better part of a year to get to market. By that time people will have already found a way to get those artists' music without that record company. Its like walking into a brick wall right after building the sucker.
For Apple to create a record label would be a mistake. It would unite the major record labels against them. Having their enemies singled out when they leave it makes it hard for any competition to be born out of those record labels.
If Steve Jobs wanted to REALLY make some money he would secretly fund a new record label with a CEO that he controlled. Have the record label actually do the proper thing for artists and for iTunes. Get the record label to start taking away serious business from the current major record labels. The best way to lead is by example. Having a record label that bows to Apple's wishes and is vastly rewarded for it would force the other record labels into compliance with Apple's wishes. Oh, and Stevie makes himself enough money on the side to buy a small country, like Sweden. DreamWorks anyone?
This is going to sound like an immensely crazy idea, but why not start your own record company?
Nice blog
This might be different if the music they were selling could be transferred from hard drive to hard drive, but the fact is, if your hard drive crashes, you lose all your music.
Kinda sucks, doesn't it?
-anonymous music listener
Not only do you lose all your music when your hard drive crashes, the iTunes Store legal agreement says you may not use any music as ringtones. And you can only use the music in 5 places. And you can only copy it 7 times. And so on. There are all sorts of arbitrary restrictions on what you're allowed to do with iTunes-bought music. Bleh. I'm going back to CDs.
Steve, you're preaching the truth man...LOL...
Apple is a BEAST, who can deny that? But so were AOL and YAHOO at one time... Yet this little company called GOOGLE didn't seem to be intimidated...
All I'm saying is now a days, college kids seem to be better trend visionaries than corporate heads and the fact that they can code and build this technology is amazing... Need I mention YouTube or MySpace? I won't be surprised if some computer science dork from a prestigous tech school builds a server and database in his dorm room combining it with a stifling business model...
Then again, what's always POSSIBLE isn't always PROBABLE...
J
This link has an interesting essay on the future of Music Industry with respect to Radiohead's In Rainbow online release
http://professio.blogspot.com/2007/10/future-of-music-industry.html#links
It seems that all these companies have their day or year, Aplle were on their knees, then saved by the ipod, but it seems that these things are move and change, AOL was going to take over the world, so was Microsoft but there is always something new that the humble common people find fascinating, myspace now facebook etc, it keeps moving along and change is enevitable.
3000 payday loan
4000 payday loan
3000 online payday
Hello my name is Jane, few days ago i open my new blog. I would like to add your site to my blog, that I think and hope it will help inform visitors about your site. I select for it's quality your blog - structure, design and content. I would like to ask if you can provide me more, details, information about your site.
my blog is - http://myspainradio.blogspot.com/ and you can leave your information in the comments of this page
http://myspainradio.blogspot.com/2008/04/radio-music-networks-blogs.html
Check out ICanFreelance.com. There are plenty of freelance marketplace for you.
What do you mean?
iTunes does not have 80% market share...
According to recent research from the University of Hertfordshire 96 per cent of 18 to 24-year-olds in the U.K. surveyed have made illegal copies of music AND the portion of illegally downloaded tracks is 61 per cent!! of the total market for Downloaded Digital Music.
iTunes will continue to fail to reach its targets because there is no market anymore. Kids just download music for free. so do I ha
The real question is, how will music continue to be created like this?
Nice Post
-------------
article rewrite
welcome to the wow gold, cheap WoW Power Leveling, service site,wotlk gold buy cheap wow gold,wow gold,world of warcraft power leveling buy wow gold
With a wow goldstaff, you will wow goldfind you canbuy wow gold use 'Autocasting' buy wow goldoptions. Basically, cheap wow gold this lets you cheap wow goldchoose a spell wow power levelingto continually wow power levelingcast. As long power levelingas you wield power leveling supply runs out.
This is the second euphoric benefactor to wash your hand of long-term operate beside iTunes over the feature of price. Universal Music put in the picture Apple closer this year that it have choose not to renew it's long-term contract.
nice post!
Post a Comment