Sunday, November 04, 2007

This Hollywood writers strike cracks me up

Hollywood writers are due to go on strike unless a last-minute move saves the day. It's either sad or funny, I can't decide. The overpaid spoiled morons who write all the shit that gets blasted out onto the TV networks want even more money for their piles of shit. What makes it beautiful is that the guys on the other side of the fight are even more overpaid and more moronic and more full of crap than the writers. It's like watching two guys you really despise get into a barfight, and you don't know which one you want to win and ultimately you just hope they both beat the daylights out of each other.

You must admit it's fun watching two groups of untalented dopes fighting over money. I mean look at the Fall 2007 TV schedule. Does anyone really believe that the world will suffer if this pile of absolute shit all goes on hiatus? If all of network TV vanished from existence tomorrow morning would it make a difference? I mean come on. Deal or No Deal? Retards guessing about briefcases? Or dancing with the fucking stars? How did Tom Bergeron ever get on TV and why is he still there?

Sure, there are a few exceptions. The Simpsons. Thirty Rock. The Office. But even the good stuff is forced to be somewhat retarded by the strictures of the network system. Ever seen the original Office, the one made in England? Way better than the one on NBC. Let's face it. Network TV blows. The system blows. The business model blows. The consumer experience blows. But worst of all the content blows. What's more, the system is set up in such a way that it pretty much requires the content to blow.

Meanwhile all the good stuff is happening off the network grid. There's this huge pool of young smart funny talent who want nothing to do with networks and are just rolling their own. Right now they're not getting paid much because the bulk of the frigtarded audience just sits there in front of the network boob tube watching moronic former boy band members trying to do ballroom dancing. It's just inertia. The viewers do what they've always done.

But that's changing. The networks know it. The frigtards will get old and die and the people who are young kids today are not even going to pay attention to the networks. That's why the networks are trying to push into new media. (Not that it will work. The old guys don't have the right stuff in their DNA. Look at NBC flailing around with its idiotic download plans.) Better yet, even as the networks are making their feeble attempts at figuring out the InterWebs, they're now being held back and hampered by their own writers. Great move, retards! Fight the change!

I guess we can't blame these writers. They've all got big stupid houses in Los Angeles and Hawaii, plus Porsches and Land Rovers and way more money than they ever deserved and they got it all for producing what history will view as probably the worst bulk of absolute fecal matter that has ever been passed off onto the world. Honestly these guys have run the biggest scam I've ever seen. Now they're clinging to that fat stupid system that has served them so well.

Writers, listen to me. I mean this from the depths of my Jobsian heart. Thank you. By clinging to your networks and hampering their efforts, you're helping the whole ship sink faster. You're making my job easier. So keep it up! Unionize, band together, lock arms in your lifeboats. For those of us on the other side of this battle, this is all great news.

Up here in Silicon Valley we are busy building the next system and we are laughing our asses off at you guys. We all know you're going away. It's only a matter of time. You're latched on to a dying system like so many fat babies sucking on so many big fat Hollywood fake tits. Now the tits are drying up. That's what this strike is really all about. It's the beginning of the death throes of the network system. At some subconscious level you clueless fuckwits have begun to realize that the future has nothing to do with the system to which you're attached.

Obtain a clue, people. You're sitting there fighting over residuals and terms of this and that when what you should be doing is leaving the system altogether and helping to build the next one. But you can't do that because you can't get off the heroin of network money. You're hooked to a lifestyle. For all your groovy talk and hip little soul patch beards, you're the most risk-averse people in the world. You're lifers. I mean, you belong to a fucking union! How fucked up and 20th century is that?

Listen, Hollywood TV writers. For fifty years you've had a nice little gig going for yourselves. You've unionized and set up all these stupid rules and you've created a closed-off little club and you've done all you could to keep other people out of the club so you could make ridiculous amounts of money just for pumping out piles of shit content. Now guess what? The Internet blows that up. The Internet is anarchy. There's no writers guild. There's no limit on the number of channels. The writers and actors and directors who've been shut out of your club are creating their own alternate universe. They don't want to be in your club. Worse yet for you, they don't want you in their club, either. They don't need you. They don't give a shit about what you do. They view you as a bunch old, fat, stupid, overpaid hacks. Which you are.

Well, good luck with that strike, assholes. And seriously, thanks. I mean it.

107 comments:

LIBERTY POST EDITOR said...

Are you the real Steve Jobs?

LIBERTY POST EDITOR said...

You're funny Mr. Jobs. What's the real scoop here? Good blog.

Anonymous said...

If you like The Office for British comedy, you should try Phoenix Nights!

Anonymous said...

All the shows you list as crap are 'reality' shows, which are loved by the TV honchos who don't have to pay writers to make them.

All the shows you list as good are driven by writers.

No writers means more reality crap.

Brian Ward said...

That's true. There is a lot of pure crap on TV, but the strike also means that shows like Letterman, Colbert, and The Daily Show have to be suspended too. SNL has to stop too.

I wouldn't exactly put those in the crap category. Maybe SNL...

UneasyLiesTheHead said...

FSJ, for the first time ever while reading you're column, I'm compelled to say -- You Don't Get It On This One.

Do you know what the average network television show staff writer makes, and the kind of hours they work? These are middle class incomes we're talking about here, not huge-ass superficial $20 Million Dollar Hollywood Paydays. People raising families. People that used to depend on residuals (additional payment for additional showings of the content they created) coming from the syndication market to help make their livings. A syndication market that has pretty much disappeared thanks to DVD.

You complain that the writer's don't have any stones? You're right, in the past, the WGA let themselves get bowled over far too easily when VHS, and then DVD came about, and they accepted lowball residual formulas for both of these formulas. The equivalent monies from sales of VHS and DVD not only don't replace the income lost from syndication; it isn't even close. But the WGA had been so afaid of dealing with work stoppages, and the the ramifications, they gave up and went soft in past conflicts.

Now it's time for the Internet, which EVERYBODY knows is huge. And the networks want to pay the writers the same residuals as they do on VHS/DVDs -- even though there is less overheard for digital sales. And that the VHS/DVD residuals formula was a joke and a pittance in the first place. The networks show programs mulitple times on the net -- for free -- and the creators o that content get nothing at all for their work. The writers are standing up for themselves and demanding something better. Strangely, the networks are saying no, so they can have more money for themselves! Shocking, isn't it?

In fact, the networks aren't even willing to negotiate with the WGA on the residuals point. They're pretty much forcing the strike, because they think they'll be able to wait the writers out. Any short term hit on income is worth it to them because New Media is where its at, and the Studios don't want to share.

I'm sure Real Steve Jobs has had no experience with that kind of greed in his dealings whatsoever, right?

You are usually spot on in your spearing of current issues, FSJ, but please don't misrepresent this issue, especially by linking to an article in one of the industry trade papers, both of which (along with many of the agency, managers, and other support elements) are far more worried about their own potential losses if ripped from the business' fiscal teat by a writer's strike than they are about any sort of decent business practice or fair coverage on whether the writers are doing the correct thing in this case.

Check out Nikki Finke's DeadlineHollywood for more balance coverage on the issue, or United Hollywood.

In any case, the people that the writers are battling now are the same people that are stonewalling Apple's digital movie/TV initiatives. The network's shortsightedness and myopic technological view is key to both situations, so at the very least, you should honor the place where you and the writers become one. Namaste, FSJ.

SSteve said...

Wow, Jobso. That left me breathless. Now tell us how you really feel.

Yeah, I'd miss 30 Rock and The Simpsons. And Sarah Silverman. Probably something else too, but nothing pops into my head.

Anonymous said...

America's Funniest Home Videos has been running on network TV for *years*, and these frigtards are surprised at the success of Youtube? Good gravy, I want that gig.

Anonymous said...

Ah, it's always nice when overpaid columnists bash people who want to make enough money to afford a family *and* a house.

Way to help make the world a worse place! Namaste.

andy said...

Thanks for your text to read. I like your kind of speaking.

Anonymous said...

I can tell the book tour is making you cranky.

Incidentally, why not release your book online only? And let people pay "whatever they want" for it...

Nick said...

The English version of The Office, and its writer Ricky Gervais, are the most overrated piles of junk ever. The media only ever built this great fart-filled blimp of hypesteria round them because the other shows on TV were, incredibly, even worse.

I mean, did you see Gervais' episode of The Simpsons. I've had more fun from herpes.

Nick (in England)

Turkish said...

only from FSJ, can true words of wisdom emerge about the current status of our screwed up authoritarian content providers. shooting yourself in the foot never gets old for them, but eventually, the blood will run dry.

Anonymous said...

Very good, FSJ. Thank you for calling this by name. Networks out of the picture! Imagine that. Our quality of life would jump several notches. Maybe our IQ could get a chance or maybe it has already been tested.

r3loaded said...

Nice analysis there Dan/FSJ (for the purpose of this post, it actually doesn't matter which persona you use). Traditional media never understood new technology and will never "get it"

Steve Copley said...

Ouch - that was some vent!

I'm in pain just from reading it - I almost feel sorry for those poor writers on who are the target of your bile!

Or... maybe not!

Roll on Internet TV!

Anonymous said...

OOOOOF!

I guess it's called Tough Love for a reason.

I get the Tough; where's the Love?

Pretty brutal career advice.

I'm going to put my head in an oven.

Anonymous said...

Hmm, the two examples of how bad TV is right now are "Deal or No Deal" and "Dancing with the Stars" - two unscripted shows. Kind of proves the writers' point. I agree with "30 Rock" being funny. I tried watching "The Office" for awhile, but I found myself squirming in my seat; although it was very funny at times, I just can't stand humor based on embarrassing situations. And the Simpsons - well, nothing lasts forever; yet I still watch it EVERY week, but haven't laughed in years. The only two new shows I really like are "Journeyman" and "Life".

I recall a FSJ post that stated sites like YouTube would never replace the networks because the content was so poor. Personally, I don't see any evidence to the contrary. I could see that YouTube could lead to a Network deal for someone if their content was really good, but I see that as being a little more likely than a person with a Public Access TV show making the jump.

Anonymous said...

Interesting... The shows you use in example as being crap are: Deal, no Deal, and Dancing with the Stars are reality TV. They don't use writers. Are you a frigtard?

The shows you state as exceptions, The Simpsons, Thirty Rock, The Office... They're shows with, WRITERS!

Yeah, there are a lot of crappy shows out there but the writers are getting screwed out of DVD royalties and download royalties...

Anonymous said...

Man, leave Tom Bergeron alone. He a good guy, from my college town, Haverhill, MA. The town that also gave us Rob Zombie. Sure, the show's crap. But it's not his fault.

And that's what this strike is going to give us, more "reality" tv and game shows. Time to pull out the dvd's and vhs tapes. Or maybe I can just rewatch Zen Master Tito win it again.

Frank Sands said...

Let me ask you something, FSJ, and please be honest: how much do you get for each copy of OS X that is sold? Is it more than 5 cents? If it is, than you have a better deal than the writers have. And what they want is not absurd, thye want 8 cents from each DVD. Boston Legal season 1 DVD costs 39.98 dollars, 5 cents of that is 1.25% of the price. Can you say to me, with a straight face, that 1.25% is a fair percentage to the guy that created the show?

Anonymous said...

hilarious post...love it

Si said...

Seriously, network TV are made for people to vegetate to. It's only a matter of time before the smarter crowds reach critical mass and blow this up in their face. Unfortunately, I doubt it'll hurt them much because there will always be frigtards and the new generation of viewers won't be able to escape out of that well.

Max Rosenbaum said...

Damn, FSJ...

Wouldn't RSJ be mad at you for giving away the strategy?

what am I saying?? They're past the point of no return.

Good luck.

Kevin said...

Who the hell watches network TV anymore? Oh yeh I forgot, WOMEN.

Antonin said...

Hello.

I find the tone of this post surprisingly agressive. As a Frenchman, I don't know much about the Hollywood system. Is it that iritating?

Anonymous said...

Dude, you are on fire!

Go for the kill!

boom

Jonno

Jamie said...

All of my friends who are Hollywood writers write awesome stuff; it's the producers who pick the crap, and insist their "Bourne Identity meets Bugsy Malone" concept is a MILLION TIMES BETTER than the stuff the writers come up with independently.

The Writers Guild exists to protect writers that producers hire to re-write. If it didn't exist, the producers would hire a hundred guys at typewriters for $500/week to write intros for "Survivor," and then at the end of every show the "Written By" credit would go to the producer's brother.

emp said...

Somehow, deep inside, I knew there was some reason I thought the whole strike thing was utter bullshit. Thank you for making it all so clear. The cartels are all in their death throes, desperate to cling to their golden teat, while adding no real value whatsoever to our culture. Hopefully, this strike will be the coup de grace, and a new system with merit as it's base currency will take over.

Can I get a fuck yeah.

Shawn Petriw said...

That is one of the best, and most astute, rants ever. Thanks FSJ.

Anonymous said...

Ouch!
Don't hold back, tell us how you really feel.

This is an angry side of FSJ I haven't seen before. Not funny, not kidding, but then- there's nothing funny about the mind fart bread and circus routine that is network television.

bread and circuses

Bard

Anonymous said...

Just wanted to point you to an alternate view.

Shilton said...

Oh FSJ, you keep this funny shit coming- "You're latched on to a dying system like so many fat babies sucking on so many big fat Hollywood fake tits. Now the tits are drying up." How do you come up with this? Sometimes I have a hard time telling when you're trying to be steve and when you're being fake steve, but this post had a nice balance of both. You better be careful or you'll start actually thinking like the real steve. Nevertheless, good on ya, keep it coming!

Isaac said...

Look FSJ,
First of all, there is no magical alternative universe developing. Independent film is what it always has been, YouTube sucks, and we're stuck the writers we've got... as the need for content grows they're more needed than ever. Secondly, the witers are not rich by any means. They get no credit and they're totally undercompensated; they are the perpetual little bitch of the film industry, and endowing them with more money, rights and negotiating power can have only positive results for the viewer. Putting a modicum of dignified control back into the hands the the industries' TRUE creators is an essential step. Aside from those points, your post is more or less on the spot.

Mike Lisac said...

FSJ: Calling Unions so "20th Century" when many people rely on them for healthcare is off the mark. If it weren't for Unions, many people wouldn't have a chance at getting healthcare and benefits - things that should be the right of every American worker. Yes, there are times when they go bad, due to greed (UAW, Major League Baseball and Football), but for the American worker, they can be a godsend.

Yes, I am in a Union. The Union provides healthcare and benefits for my family that I have found to be unmatched in my field, and I work in I.T. No, we don't carry baseball bats or light 55 gallon drums on fire (THAT was so 20th Century), but we do get a unified voice that helps us keep what we value.

Are Unions completely necessary? No. Many companies have found that if you treat your employees fairly, and often as equals, they will be your biggest sales force. Have you been to Costco? Some of Costco is Union, but most isn't. They pay their employees well and give them good benefits. Wonder where that idea came from?

Mike said...

I do agree that the TV shows are leaving a lot to be desired. Seriously, where do the find some of this shit?

Roy Herron said...

AMEN!

Jay said...

Nicely said, FSJ.

Anonymous said...

Ha ha ha!

Cruel and true...

Steve said...

Viva la revolución, Steve! The Internet is already killing the record industry, with stuff like Radiohead's In Rainbows album. The TV and movie industries are next. Namaste.

Tim said...

I've had it with these highly-paid writers! Writing for TV should be free and open, and let anyone contribute to it. Because it's worked out so well with writing software.

nic pfost said...

FSteve,

this post is so amazingly accurate i couldn't even laugh at it for at least a full minute.

but fear not, the laughter came.

brilliant.

Anonymous said...

I couldn't agree more. I can not believe the empty worthless dribble the networks are putting out on the tube. Even the cable networks have absolute junk on tv.
This now includes MTV, A&E, and VH1.
I don't know what Nielson does, either supposidly listening to what people like to watch. Here in the Midwest/Great Lakes near Nielsons HDQRTS.
I get pissed just turning on the tv.
Nielson, the networks, and writers do not listen at all to what to put on.
But, this does make Apple TV more attractive, and justify the cost.

vaporland said...

I guess Sunday is now the official day of the FSJ "insightful rant"...

I prefer Monday AM for squirting coffee out of my nose... coffeeboarding, anyone?

You'll die ... laughing.

Anyway, I tossed my TV in a dumpster when ABC canceled Max Headroom for Mr. Belvedere...

Westwind said...

Who watches network TV?

comanchezen said...

technically, steve-o, i believe the best term appiled to the fall 2007 (or any other, for that matter), is SPOMS: steaming pile of monkey shit.

the sopranos - now there was a fucking tv show!

Anonymous said...

Hey FSJ...

At least make your sarcastic point correctly.

"Deal or No Deal? Retards guessing about briefcases? Or dancing with the fucking stars?"

None of those shows are "written" by members of the Writers Guild... in fact, you'll get more of that crap once the writers go on strike.

Ruhayat X said...

You're absolutely right on the nose about people making a big deal about nothing important. The whole world is moving in that direction.

I mean, look at the stuff Apple has been coming out with recently. Slimmer music players? Touchscreen phones that don't allow you to even make decent calls? Talk about an influx of tripe.

Movie Fan said...

Speaking of Hollywood, it looks like the studios are about to try to go around iTunes and sell moves ...

Movies?! Now we can watch movies "within Facebook"?

Now the writers can just make their own movies and screen them inside the social networks. Ha!

Nononono said...

You are very good FSJ, especially in your more serious posts. Rock on.

Brendan said...

TV - Lipstick on a pig
(To borrow the immortal words of FSJ)

The problem with TV is that it obeys the Law of Strawberry Jam - the more you spread it, the thinner it gets. This is exactly what has happened to TV in the UK with the proliferation of channels and the weird notion of a former Prime Minister (the abominable Thatcher) that the best government policy for TV channels was to sell them off to the highest bidders.

Inevitably, the result was a descent to the bottom in terms of quality of programming. TV has become a diet of cheap-to-make junk, such as gardening, cookery, DIY and quiz shows. That nightmare of modern TV, the “reality” show, serves mainly to perpetuate the careers of tenth-rate sub-celebrities. This abysmal dross is targeted at, and fit only for, saddos, psychos and sickos.

As the great American screenwriter Rod Serling observed, the potential of TV to educate and enlighten has been usurped by its potential to delude and obscure reality. The bean-counting, cost-cutting highest bidders who bought British TV don't want educated critical thinkers. These corporate vandals want cretinised dolts who will happily lap up the content-free, brain-dead rubbish spewed out during the gaps between adverts selling them junk they don’t need.

Here in the UK, the Whitehaven area of western Cumbria recently became the first to have the old analogue TV signal switched off as the first stage of the UK's switchover to digital TV. This caused much talk about the quality of digital TV pictures. However, the quality of digital TV pictures is immaterial if the programme content is rubbish. Bah! - lipstick on a pig. Wake me up when there is something worth watching on TV.

Brendan Rowland (non-owner of a TV set - who needs one when there is BBC Radio 4?)

Mike Paus said...

I'm glad someone has the sack to call out the union hacks for all the mindless drivel on the idiot box. I'll watch YouTube on my iPhone and cancel Comcast.

Anonymous said...

Hey, Steve, don't pick on the writers. They're not the only whores of the TV network world. There are director whores, agent whores, lighting whores, camera whores, etc.

And none of them are responsible for the wasteland of television. We have met the enemy and he is US. We, the stupid masses, have been getting what we deserve all this year. What we WANT. The really good stuff has too little audience to make it on television.

Now, as you know better than me, network television is about to be destroyed by the Internet in the same way that the big label music industry has been destroyed.

But will the Internet create better television? Certainly not YouTube! Its a much bigger pile of dung then commercial television ever was.

And YouTube will never be the answer, because unlike books, the creative artist can never do a great video work by him or herself. An aspiring great American novelist can maybe forego a paycheck for a year and write something brilliant that somebody will publish. But a great video script still needs SCRATCH to produce it. You've got to pay people. Lots of em.

The real answer is iTunes, and I bow to your utter brilliance in the way you've set this up.

Because what separates iTunes from YouTube is MONEY. It gets money into the pockets of the people who produce video content. Most of the money will still go to pay for people who write crap, because we are the enemy, and we love crap.

But unlike network TV, which can't afford to air stuff that only makes a little money, iTunes gets money into EVERYBODY's pockets.

Its the long tail, stupid. That's what iTunes is really about. Making it WORTH creating a quality video that only a small audience will watch, because this small audience will pay something for it (and keep paying for it for years and years), so that even a relatively small audience can give a decent financial return to pay for at least some quality video.

And that's what the $1.99 fight is all about. Its about the long tail. The networks want the price to go up to preserve the system as they know it: a few big financial winners and NOBODY else gets paid squat. But if you can hold the price down, all sorts of people get money in their pockets who would never have had a chance to see a dime from the network system.

We're just starting to see this happen for real. Video content is just now being written specifically for iTunes distribution. They won't make a lot of money doing that, but the best of them will at least cover their costs, and the future is brighter still.

Give a whore a chance to earn a decent living doing something else, and most of them will leave the street. Even a whore despises whoredom.

Viva $1.99 and the long tail. Let the era of quality programming begin!

Anonymous said...

Amen!

Mike Cane said...

>>>The overpaid spoiled morons who write all the shit that gets blasted out onto the TV networks want even more money for their piles of shit.

Must I call Giaccalone on your ass?! You are insulting my brothers & sisters here!! No, the hell with Giaccalone. This calls for Fava! (Did you know Moshe OWES Fava some favors? Doesn't *everybody*?)

You might have to start typing this blog with your nose. If even that bit is left alone.

When you mess with the heritage of Rod Serling and Pady Chayefsky, you better watch out.

Now go atone. With a colonic or three.

Grobelaar said...

i think deep down you're just jealous that unlike you journos, the creative writers are able to show a bit of solidarity and rightfully ask for a better slice of the cake.

Anonymous said...

Magnificent, awesome, the best thing I've read all week, right on the button, FSJ for president, or something

James said...

Spoken like the Forbes arsehole you are. I wonder what the real Steve has to say about it, not that I care much more. He fires people, but Apple pays well and they get a nice cafeteria.

Anonymous said...

Uh, Dan, I think you're supposed to be in character when you crap on people. What's up? Your scripts get turned down a few years ago?

Grandmaster FUD said...

Wow.

No other words describe it.

Anonymous said...

AWSOME!
This is the most insightful piece I've read on the subject. Thanks FSJ. I mean it.

Anonymous said...

So what did you get up to with BHG? Man, youre on fire

Anonymous said...

Any comments on this:

Why Your iPod Doesn’t Have Bluetooth

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/industry/4229530.html

Ted said...

"I guess we can't blame these writers. They've all got big stupid houses in Los Angeles and Hawaii, plus Porsches and Land Rovers and way more money than they ever deserved..."

The average annual income for a member of the WGA is something like $50K. WTF are you talking about?

Anonymous said...

"The Simpsons"? It hasn't been funny in at least five years (after a long run as the funniest show ever). A strike could only help -- maybe get Al Jean to quit.

andy said...

money world is to obsolete

Anonymous said...

Interesting use of Leopard features by the pervs

http://joyoftech.com/joyoftech/joyarchives/1030.html

Josef K said...

Re: anonytard on the Bluetooth iPod conspiracy

Will the iPod charge through Bluetooth as well?

No, fuckhead.

Next time post a relevant reply to the post.

Prof. Telabling said...

the new Gphones out, you are doomed.

Grandmaster FUD said...

7:20 AM Ted.

The average annual income for a member of the WGA is over $200k.

Anonymous said...

as a programmer i'd like to get in on the writers deal. sure my employer pays me to write the code, but I should be also be paid everytime it's run.

comanchezen said...

@uneasyliesthehead

dag, dude, wake up on the wrong side of the bed or just stay up too late watching tv?

Anonymous said...

Sure the delivery mechanism is changing. Sure the Networks might go out of business.

But replacing one pile of crap filled paid of ads that won't get out of your face with another crap filled system paid by ads that won't get out of your face AND know *way* more about you than the last one, does not seem to address the problem of actually creating anything worth watching.

Or suggest that people are more likely to watch anything good rather than endless 30 seconds clips of Johnny from the local high school lighting his farts.

The people making it might get a bit richer because the overheads go away (cough, isn't that partly what the strikie is about?), the manufacturers might (because you need and IP capable TV now), the distribution companies might (because they can lock you into a juicy new monthly contract that has lots of 'value' that you don't need), but I don't see the audience getting richer in any way from this.

Everybody wins, except society. Revolutions used to be a good thing didn't they?

Chowdahead said...

Is it me or does FSJ miss something: the shows he is complaining about: "Dancing with Stars", "Deal or Schlemeal" or whatever... are all reality shows. They will continue as new programs. It's the other shows like Heroes, Daily Show, Conan O'Brien, etc that will go into reruns. Those I'll miss.

David said...

You're an asshole, FSJ.

That awesome book you're plugging -- will it be released as an audiobook? Will you get paid for copies of the audiobook sold?

Yeah, I thought so.

Fucking hypocrite.

Anonymous said...

This is the problem with the pseudonym. Is FSJ caricaturing a position, in order to show its idiocy? Or is the author saying what he believes, but just exaggerating for effect? Hard to tell. Although the reality show examples are so obviously wrong that it makes me think he's parodying the position.

Anonymous said...

Dude, your act is getting old; crapping on writers? Substituting profanity for style? Blaiming scriptwriters for unscripted reality shows? Get a grip guy - I'm not even going to call you Fake Steve...it's like the Fake Fake Steve.

jzilber said...

Brilliant post, FSJ. The folks standing up for the WGA and the "facts" (like actual average incomes for writers) are missing the point: the system is at a dead-end.

Yes, the producers are more exploitative than the writers. Yes, The Office is better than Deal or No Deal. But what's the point of haggling over which is the lesser of two evils?

Sure, the strike is justified if the ultimate goal is to bring the producers and writers shares of the pie into a more equitable distribution. But will either group do anything to raise the bar of this dying business mdoel? Didn't think so.

For over 50 years, the TV business has trained the public to think of video entertainment as an entitlement. You get your choice of 3 (or 300) 24 x 7 channels, free of charge or at least heavily subsidized by advertising.

Until recently, this trade-off didn't exist anywhere else. You couldn't get free cars or free food simply by being willing to sit through a sales pitch (with the occasional exception, like getting a free weekend for two at a timeshare hotel for sitting through a 20-minute infomercial).

Even within the media universe, no other mainstream product has been free. You pay $25 for a book, or $10 if you're willing to wait a year for the paperback edition. You pay a couple hundred bucks a year for a newspaper, $100 for an opera or Broadway show, $10 for museum admission, etc.

But TV? You're entitled to that for free. And guess what? 99% of the time, we the viewing public get what we've paid for.

It's hit the tipping point. The Gen-iTunes has collectively decided that paying $2/show -- if they can control what they see, when the see it, how often they see it, etc. -- is a fair price to pay to raise the bar.

And the networks and all who play that game have it backwards. NBC thinks "So how do I get a bigger of slice of that iTunes pie?" The writers think "How do I get a bigger slice of that NBC pie?" Meanwhile, the audience is already realizing "How can I steer my two bucks to pay for something worth watching, by bypassing network shows altogether?"

Giles Bowkett said...

Re Ted, 50K: seriously. Hollywood writers work so hard they make the worst Silicon Valley workaholic look like a stoner on his couch. I've been in both worlds, I'm telling you what I've seen.

Splashman said...

FSJ is right on. Anyone who relies on a union is admitting they aren't good enough to make the grade on their own.

As to the writers and the networks, I couldn't care less. I haven't watched TV (network or cable) in ten years. They could all disappear tomorrow and the world would be a much better place.

Anonymous said...

Average income is deceptive. I'm sure there are people making no money dragging down the average.

What's the median income? That would be more telling.

Not Paul said...

Dude, did you wake up on the wrong side of your cave this morning?

The only good TV is on Microsoft's Channel 9. I thought you knew that.

No Tom Bergeron anywhere. Ain't it cool?

Lauren N. said...

All you/your little persona know about the writer's business fits in the tiny little hard drives of each shrinking iteration of the iPod. All the content shuffling, pricing models and related technology in the world would be valued at about *nothing* without content. So bow down and say the thanks for the drivel/content you despise for driving your business.

*blows a kiss*

Anonymous said...

so true
I had been thinking theres only 3-4 good shows on tv anyway, i mean the writing is so terrible ive even though bout quitting my job to write for Lost or Smallville or really any hunk of shit with bad writing

Guess tpdays the day for a career change eh?

sparksinner said...

This post seems to run counter to an argument you made months ago, summed up brilliantly by this line:

"...YouTube is the Special Olympics of TV."

So what about it? I thought you said the networks were the professionals and we should let them take care of the creating?

Tony Healy said...

FSJ, the reason for this strike is precisely the issue you're bashing them with - the recognition that internet sales are a valuable and increasing part of their work output.

Like your Dan Lyons persona, these guys reject the freetard approach to work. Surely that's to be admired?

bobdmac said...

Here's Ze Frank's take on the strike:

http://www.zefrank.com/zesblog/archives/2007/11/strike_day.html

Simon said...

I wish any of the dozens of writers I know drove a Porsche to lend me or had a beach front house to host a party at. I guess the only writers in your circle are show runners or successful features guys, even amongst them careers tend to be short and it's the new format residuals that will be buying their meals during their retirement...

Anonymous said...

Those of you defending the writers based on their pay are still missing the point - it is money for the pure, unadulterated mindless drivel that makes up 95% of TV and it is too much at any price.

FSJ is spot on, the long over due death thoes have started for this business just like the assholes that call themselves the record industry.

Good riddance and let's hope that silicon valley's new age allows for real talent to emerge from under the layers of shit that we have been force fed by the accountants for all these years.

Anonymous said...

spot on, [fake] steve! i've been saying this for years.

mjvlev said...

Correctards of the world, unite!

I don't know which is funnier:

FSJ's rants, or the people seriously trying to "correct" him...

Does Steven Colbert have people sending-in corrections to his monologues??

Toki-chan said...

FSJ, as much as I would like to agree to this, I can only look back and think that when something is about to die it's going to fight the hardest to live. Truth be told, I don't expect them to fold, and I expect that this strike won't work. If these guys really make as little as they do, that's got to be hard if your raising a family, or especially if you have a kid in college, etc. Union isn't going to make an impact this year anyway. If they had done it at the beginning of the year, they may have just gotten it.

Anonymous said...

Loved it! Truly a Miller-worthy rant. Would make Celine on PCP seem like "Exhibit A" at the Kevorkain trial (as Dennis might say).

Anonymous said...

The bottle necks (TV, books, music distribution) which allowed the identification of genius are gone. With the open web no one knows who did it. We all must be rewarded if we are to continue to create in the society. No more darlings of the king. I hope there is enough money for all. Even FSJ 's existence will be reduced to a communistic cubical life style.

Alex said...

I hope this is ironic (although even if it is, it's not particularly funny). If it's not, you're an idiot for reasons I will not bother going into in detail as you wouldn't be able to grasp them.

To make it short and sweet, do you honestly think it's fair that the people whom more than any other are essential to these shows' existence should get a 0.2% royalty rate on a DVD, and nothing at all on new media?

How about if you created something amazing for your employers and they gave you little or nothing above your standard salary, whilst their new product, which would not be there without you, made them £$£$£$£$?

Muppet.

Anonymous said...

The writers wouldn't have any say if they weren't part of a Union. The fatass network fucktards would just keep screwing them and feed the TV watching public even more shit just to line their pockets.

Splashman sounds like someone who relies on kissing major ass to keep his job. Oh yeah, and thank your Unions for getting you what is called a "weekend" and "benefits" and "training". No system is perfect, but the best ones are ones that merge the best of Unions and non-unions.

thejester said...

This is classic FSJ. Welcome back to form!

Many comments throw up another viewpoint, and many are well made. However they miss the point here. This is a satire, and it's the brutal nature of the writing with such sharp and astute wit that makes me a reader of this blog. That FSJ isn't right about everything is hardly the point.

Anonymous said...

A lot of TV is crap. A lot of your Blog is crap. Most all of YouTube is crap. Fake Steve, perhaps you need to spend some time learning what you stand for.

Anonymous said...

Well said.....what's on TV tonight?

Anonymous said...

TV is for morons. Unions are for the simple minded (or dumb < then high school labor workers, south of the border...) Anyhow I am liking the strike. Good stuff. What is really sad is that most morons will simply watch the repeats of this crap and wait for it to end.... sad fat americans

eva m said...

Dear jzillber:

Even within the media universe, no other mainstream product has been free.

Radio? Library? Also free. Have been for some time.

Mike Cane said...

You know, I have Fava's number on speed-dial. And it's on my *Google*Phone.

Yes, that's how angry I am!

Now call off your lapdog, Eisner!!

Eisner's advice to striking writers: Blame Steve Jobs, not the studios

This is your final warning.

Mike Cane said...

Eh, you see? You see?

FSJ has not been posting because I had to call Fava on RDL.

Poor lad.

Don't worry. He's young. He'll heal fast.

Dammit.

WGA forever!

Anonymous said...

FSJ, we hardly knew ye, but now you've gone and jumped the shark...

Now we know how much you really suck... what a disappointment. You were never really more than one of those sarcastic kids whose only talent was running people down. Now we know.

And the one thing that you were actually able to create and will be remembered for is ignorant (if occasionally snarky/funny) crap. Goodbye frigtard.

jzilber said...

eva m -- you're right, I should have said "broadcasting" or "TV/radio" has been the only free/entitlement medium (not TV alone).

(I don't see libraries as a medium -- they're a distribution channel for other media.)

Anyway, regardless of whether there are other examples of predominantly free/subsidized media, my point was that the public has been getting what it's been paying for, and the times are changing -- more and more people are now happy to pay for video entertainment if it's better or more convenient.

And it seems like more and more, people are less willing to pay for other types of media, even if it introduces some limitations or inconveniences. For example, I think the era of shrinkwrapped software is going to diminish rapidly, with GoogleDocs replacing MS Office and other free or open source alternatives going mainstream as the notion of paying for general-purpose software becomes a bit quaint...

Harris said...

You think this is a joke...what about the stagehands' strike on Broadway.

Anonymous said...

I am not the original author of the following comments. They are by Orson Scott Card (a sci-fi book author who is adapting one of his books for film) and the original post can be found at: http://www.hatrack.com/osc/reviews/everything/2008-01-06.shtml
=========================
News about the writers' strike. Let me start off by saying that I'm a member of the union and a believer in the cause.

Just like publishers, the studios always try to maximize their profits by cutting out the writers. Even though everyone in Hollywood knows -- and repeatedly says -- that you can't do anything on a movie till you have a good script, they continue to treat writers as if they were cockroaches that somehow got into the fruit salad.

Writers have long suffered from the constant irritation of directors who did not write the script being given the proprietary credit: "A film by ..." Unless the director also gets the sole writing credit, this statement is always a lie -- but the studios seem to believe the French nonsense that the director is the author of the film. The proof that this is never true is a list of all the very bad films made by "great" directors who thought they could make up for the deficiencies in a bad script.

But the writers aren't striking about the insult of the proprietary credit. We're striking over the deep injury of being cut out of our fair share of DVD and internet sales. The studios think that our share is nothing. Their attitude is, "You got paid the first time around, what's your beef?"

Yes, the writer got paid. Let's say he got $300,000 for writing the script. In 1994. Now the movie is making hundreds of thousands in DVD sales, and the writer hasn't sold a script since 1998. Why should the studio continue to make money from his work, while the writer gets nothing? Isn't it still his script, his story, the words and actions he thought up, that are making all that money?

Writers get a lot of money per script. But before you dismiss us as a bunch of overpaid babies, please remember that we never know where the next check is coming from. Sell a script for $300,000 -- and the film might never get made. You might not sell another script for ten years. Suddenly that wasn't quite as much money as it sounded like at first.

The problem comes back to copyright. The studios require writers to sign work-for-hire contracts, which means that even though the writer invented everything in the script, the studio becomes the legal "author" of the movie.

I think this situation is immoral -- though I've signed those contracts because there's no other choice. It's especially galling because the studios are now fighting to make copyright perpetual, so they can keep making money from long-dead writers' work -- while paying nothing for the privilege.

Studios create nothing. They just decide which scripts to make and pay for them. This is all well and good in a capitalist society -- but the copyright law is not a corporate welfare plan, it's a device to encourage creativity. The studios don't have any creativity -- the writers do. So the law should be shaped to encourage writers, not the studios that steal from them.

Society benefits from having copyright laws that make it profitable to create literary works like books and scripts; but society also benefits when those copyrights are only temporary. At some point, they should all enter the public domain so anyone can duplicate them -- that encourages literature to remain alive long after it was created.

In 1978, the copyright law was amended to make sure that writers did not outlive their copyrights and watch their works enter public domain while they still were trying to live on the income from them.

But the primary beneficiary of the new extension of the copyright law was the studios. They cut the writer out from the start, and then started treating intellectual properties as if they were real estate -- created by God and theirs forever.

Here's what we writers should really be fighting for:

The long copyright that was invented to protect writers should not extend to corporations. Period.

If a literary work's copyright belongs to the human being who created it, then the copyright should last for the writer's lifetime plus ten years -- twenty if he has minor children at the time of his death.

But if the copyright is owned by a corporation or company, then the copyright should last fifteen years. Period. Done. After that, anybody can duplicate the copyrighted work without paying anything.

Most films make almost all their income in the first fifteen years. The studios have made back their investment by then or they never will. So if they insist on owning the copyright and treating the writer who created the thing as if he were a roach in the salad, they can do it -- for a decade and a half.

If they want to make money from it longer, though, they will not make the writer sign a work-for-hire contract. On the contrary, they will insist that he continue to own the copyright and only license the studio to make a movie from it. It should be illegal for such a license to be perpetual -- it would have to be renewed.

If the studio decides not to renew the license by paying the writer again, then the script reverts to the writer -- he can get the film remade if he can, and if anyone else wants to reissue the original movie, they not only have to pay the studio for their work on it, they have to buy the script rights from the writer.

With such a change in the copyright law, you wouldn't see any more writers' strikes. We would be owners, not flunkies begging at the rich studios' tables. Hollywood would finally have to act on the truth that everyone already knows but pretends not to know: Each good script is the product of one writer or writing team; all the other parts are interchangeable.

The money can come from anywhere; any director and cinematographer can film it; any actors can play the parts. Some will do better than others, of course, and some are more commercial, but only the script is irreplaceable.

Meanwhile, though, we have a strike.

Television is feeling the pain first, and we who watch TV are going to be faced with weeks, maybe months, of 180 channels "and nothing on."

There are signs of hope: A couple of individual production companies have broken ranks and signed fair deals with the Writers Guild. United Artists, owned by Paula Wagner and Tom Cruise, just signed the deal. Worldwide Pants, David Letterman's production company, had already signed the deal -- the first to do so.

What they agreed to was, in the WGA's words, "all the proposals we were preparing to make when the big media conglomerates left the bargaining table a month ago. Those proposals include appropriate minimums and residuals for new media (whether streamed or downloaded, as well as original made-for content), along with basic cable and pay-TV increases, feature animation and reality TV coverage, union solidarity language, and important enforcement, auditing, and arbitration considerations."

Meanwhile, poor Jay Leno is being tortured: his contract with NBC required him to return to work on The Tonight Show, but his membership in the WGA made it mandatory that he write nothing.

Which is really weird. He can stand up in front of the audience and talk, but he can't write anything down. So if he thinks of some good things to talk about and just wings it, improvising his monologue, he's fine. But the moment he writes down any notes or even a list of gags so he can remember the flow of his monologue, he's in breach of union rules.

This is simply insane. The union needs to lighten up and let the man live. He has a contract as a performer that he must fulfil, and at his age (the same as mine) he has an imperfect memory and probably needs to be able to jot down notes just to remember where to find his pants. I know I do. As long as he's not writing and rewriting his monologue in advance, which would clearly be a breach, give him a little slack. He's on our side.

It's hurting me, too. For instance, I have a whole new angle of attack on the script to my movie project Ender's Game. It's terrific -- it's going to make this movie absolutely work. But I can't show it to anybody. Even though I'm the author of the original book, as a union member I can't write a new adaptation and offer it for sale.

In fact, even if I weren't a union member, I couldn't do it -- because the moment the strike ended, I would be listed as having been "scab labor" for having shown my spec script around during the strike, and the union would not let me join. And, once the strike is settled, Hollywood will be a union shop again -- no work unless you're a member.

Let's face it: strikes hurt everybody. But when the owners decide to treat workers like dirt and take what they produce and use it without fair compensation, what other choice do the workers have? Unions can become too powerful -- but without unions, the profit motive will inevitably drive employers to treat their employees unfairly.

There are no exceptions to this, despite the myths believed by free market fundamentalists. You have to create an artificial labor shortage in order to drive the price of labor back up -- and that's what a strike is, an artificial labor shortage.

Meanwhile, there are a few TV series that already had many episodes in the can before the strike. And, technically, reality shows can go ahead because their writers were not covered at all under the old agreement.

The trouble is that the union's strike rules will torment those writers as surely as they're tormenting poor Jay Leno. Because the strike is partly over the issue of including reality-show writers in the union, the union has declared that any writer in a field that the WGA is trying to include in the new contract will be permanently banned from union membership. So reality shows writers are covered and not covered at the same time.

Just a word of warning, Ryan Seacrest: If you ever want to join the writers' union, don't take down any notes about what you're going to say on camera.